Should the Pittsburgh Steelers win two more games en route their NFL-leading sixth Super Bowl title, can they be considered a 21st-century dynasty? It would be their second in four years, and more importantly, give them two more in the past four years than the New England Patriots, thought to be the first (and only) dynasty this decade to date.
The Steelers are not a flashy team, nor are they even a dominant team. They are easy to dislike for me as a Ravens fan, but nowhere near Patriot-hatable. They aren't exactly world-class guys, but they generally don't possess the bend-or-break-the-rules-at-cost mentally that Bill Belichick's squad does.
The Patriots videotaped their way to three Super Bowl titles at the start of the decade, while the Steelers fielded strong teams, but not championship-caliber teams. They suffered two AFC championship game losses to New England before finally breaking through in 2005.
What would a second Lombardi trophy in four years mean? The good would be that they would supplant the Patriots as the current NFL powerhouse. The bad is that it's the Steelers, a team that won four Super Bowls with the help off avid steroid use in the 1970s. While this team doesn't closely resemble the Steel Curtain teams, history is far too appreciated in the Steel City to go unnoticed and be disconnected from the modern-day group.
I am, as usual, pessimistic about the banged-up Ravens' chances this Sunday, and the Steelers would figure to be considerable favorites against either the Eagles or Cardinals in the Super Bowl, meaning we could be heading down a familiar, and painful, path once again.
Friday, January 16, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment